HOME

 

'Who Will Write the History?'

Two gay filmmakers explore Israel's role as both victim and victimizer.

By Kevin Sites, Mon Feb 13, 6:38 PM ET

*Note: In keeping with our mission, the Hot Zone is putting a human face on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We're profiling doctors, victims of the violence, journalists and artists -- one from each side. In focusing more on the human picture than the political one, we aim to present a clearer portrayal of the scope of the conflict.

ISRAELI ARTIST 

TEL AVIV -- Gal Uchovsky is the writer of the critically acclaimed and commercially successful film "Walk on Water." He and director Eytan Fox are a filmmaking duo exploring thorny historical and contemporary issues facing

Israel.

Uchovsky and Fox are gay men -- both business and personal partners -- who have been together for 18 years.

"Walk on Water" (http://www.walkonwatermovie.com) is about an Israeli Mossad intelligence agent ordered to assassinate a former Nazi officer. The agent strikes up a friendship with the man's gay grandson in an effort to get to him. But the relationship challenges the agent's rigid view of life, even as he attempts to carry out his mission.

The following is a partial transcript of my interview with Uchovsky at Café Tif'eret, in Tel Aviv's Sheinkin neighborhood, where Uchovsky and Fox live.

KEVIN SITES: Your movie deals with a variety of issues, but a prominent theme is how a society's history defines its present. The Holocaust has defined Israel in many ways -- even dominating it -- but to evolve a society has to put history in its proper place and move forward.

Do you think that's hard to do when you have people like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad questioning whether the Holocaust actually took place?

GAL UCHOVSKY: I don't care about this guy from

Iran. He's not part of my life. I'm not part of the political game to the point that I care what someone in Iran says. But I am interested in how the Holocaust has shaped the Israeli male. It's been 70 years and we have to make some peace with it. But we still see ourselves as victims of the Holocaust.

We become victimized to the point that we've become aggressors, and now others use terror as a weapon against us. It's not the tool of the strong, it's the tool of the weak. So (in our film) we wanted to examine the fact that we still see ourselves as victims -- even though we are a vibrant nation and have a strong army that can defend us just fine.

SITES: It does say on your film's Web site, "The filmmakers believe that the fact that Israelis are still so obsessed with the Holocaust and their status as victims renders them blind to the fact they themselves have become aggressors, imposing pain and suffering on the Palestinians. The filmmakers believe that the first step in helping the Israelis understand how cruel they themselves have become lies in making some kind of peace with their own traumatic past."

What kind of suffering specifically do you mean that the Israelis have imposed on the Palestinians?

UCHOVSKY: Well, the occupation -- building all these settlements on Palestinian lands. Apartheid roads. The

West Bank is a very, very unfair thing and most Israelis are unaware of it. When you live in a conflict area you can't always think about the conflict, so you block it out; as long as the conflict doesn't bring someone to Tel Aviv to blow themselves up.

But also, it's not like the Palestinians have been very smart in how they've conducted themselves. They had opportunities and they didn't take them. People always fight about the details but there's a bigger truth.

SITES: What about those threats to Israel's existence, like the Hamas platform? Actually, what's your take on Hamas' recent victory in the Palestinian elections?

UCHOVSKY: It's been said a lot in Israel in the last two or three years that the equation that can solve the problem is one of security versus hope. Security for Israel, hope for the Palestinians. Hamas is not very radical at this moment, but they could become more radical. If everybody becomes very stupid and we don't talk with them, they'll get money from Iran and then things will get really crazy. We have to negotiate and talk with them. We are much stronger then they are. They have, like, five missiles that can kill maybe three people. But then people say here, "Oh they're not talking nice to us." Most of the polls show most Israelis say they think we should talk to them.

SITES: And on the other side, the polls show most of the Palestinians say they want Hamas to remove the "destruction of Israel" from the organization's stated principles.

UCHOVSKY: Yes, of course.

SITES: Back to the earlier question though, how do Israelis make that peace with their history, keep the Holocaust from making them a society of permanent victims?

"If people stop and think for a little bit, they start to realize places are much more complicated then their images."— Gal Uchovsky

UCHOVSKY: We have to understand that we're not there anymore. It was 1945. We had long hollow cheeks; we were very, very hungry. Some of our families were turned into soap. It was terrible. But we are not there anymore. We are a vibrant force in the world. We're not there anymore. Jews are pretty much safe in most places in the world. We are not like sheep to the slaughter. Israel was built on the notion of victimization. The "new Jew" was about creating a strong fighter, protecting his family at all costs. We have to get past that to our new reality.

SITES: You've also said your movie is a study of masculinity. In your film the gay characters become instructive in the education of Eyal, the Mossad agent. What is that education he's getting, and is there a larger lesson for Israeli society?

UCHOVSKY: I'm not comfortable with the notion of larger lessons. We tell stories first. I don't want to make movies about larger lessons. But we do want to have a place in them where it does make you think. Like issues that you can go out and talk about after you see the film.

When we started this movie we wanted to do a story about the relationship between a straight man and gay man. In most "gay-themed" movies, the gay man lives in the house and the straight man moves in next door and within in 72 minutes we'll see if the straight man turns out to be gay. It will just be the story about the pain of unrequited love. That's not the way it is. Our straight friends will most likely continue to be straight and that's good. We simply think that it's good for straight people have to gay friends. We think it makes you a better man.

SITES: How so?

UCHOVSKY: This is a bit banal, what I'm saying, but... I think at the end of the day it might be easier for straight men to connect with their feelings through another man, rather than a woman because of all the focus on the battle of the sexes. Put a gay man in with a group of straight men for a month -- things will definitely change. They will bring out some of the softer elements, a little bit more of the feminine -- but still in a masculine way. I mean the queenliest gay man is still really a man; aggressive like men, ambitious like men.

SITES: OK, what is the greatest challenge you see for Israeli society today?

UCHOVSKY: The big issue, obviously, is the peace and war thing and then comes all the rest.

SITES: But when you travel around the world, does that define you more than anything else? Will Israel only be seen framed by the conflict with the Palestinians?

UCHOVSKY: Most of the world thinks in a very clichéd way. A lot people of who saw "Walk on Water" said, "Israel looks so different than what we see on the news." If people stop and think for a little bit, they start to realize places are much more complicated then their images.

SITES: What's next for you and Eytan Fox?

UCHOVSKY: We're just editing our film called "The Bubble." It's the story of three people living in the Sheinkin area of Tel Aviv. We live in this neighborhood. It's very close to us. The characters are three roommates: two gay men, who are best friends but not lovers, and a woman. One of the guys falls in love with a Palestinian guy and brings him into their apartment and their lives in Tel Aviv. But because of society, they have to disguise who he is.

It all ends up being a kind of Shakespearean tragedy, because real life is stronger than just individuals.

The bubble refers to this area, Sheinkin. People say it's a bubble because people here are supposedly detached and don't know what's happening in the rest of Israel.

SITES: Is that true?

UCHOVSKY: I don't necessarily think so. I believe everybody lives in their own bubble. The question is which bubble will go down in history as real life and which will go down as the detached one. I think this is real life and the [illegal Israeli] settlements are an aversion to real life. The question is, who will write the history?

Most of all, we wanted to make something about our lives and we wanted to show Israelis what it feels like to be Palestinians.

Previously: Palestinian Victim

Next: Palestinian Artist 

http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs2559

RECOMMEND THIS STORY

Recommend It:

Average (Not Rated)

0.0 stars
Hot Zone Watch List
  • Algeria
  • Angola
  • Burundi
  • Chad
  • Ivory Coast
  • Korean Peninsula
  • Liberia
  • Nigeria
  • Peru
  • The Philippines
  • Thailand
  • Uzbekistan
  • Zimbabwe

Comments

Join the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

1
While I don't agree with all their views, Walk on Water is an excellent movie. I greatly respect Eytan Fox and Gal Uchovsky, both as artists and people.
Posted by rgamer7 on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 7:20 PM ET
2
Kevin man, it seems like your really buckeling under this arab preassure to demonize Israel. I'm a fan of your humanist spin but this is beyond. These two film-makers have an obviouse vandeta agians an admitedly conservative country and society that probably have made it difficult at times for them to be at peace with themselves and live comfortably with the lifestyle that is natural for them. This film (and their stance politicaly for that matter) is a rather bald-faced lashing out at that nation and society, thus rendering it the views of but a minimal portion of Jews around the world. I could write you an essay delegitamizing the claims of the film and its creators but I think you will have already identified to what I have objected too. Instead I will apeal to you to do the same kind of self evaluation stories with Palestinian subjects, if for nothing else, to see simply if they are capable of such emotional reolization!
Posted by charleyelazar on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 7:44 PM ET
3
go ahed kevin the wordl need you
Posted by sifuentesblanca@sbcglobal.net on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 8:17 PM ET
4
Thanks again for the insights from all sides of this human struggle. My conclusion from living in and traveling in dozens of countries is that we, as Americans, have a lot to learn about and from the other peoples on this planet. In addition to reading all the articles in your series, I would suggest more Americans start watching BBC or go online for their news to find out what's really happening, instead of just defaulting to the local news or even CNN. We Americans need to read how the rest of the world lives and also view us. Such insights give us an opportunity to wake up and smell the coffee, because it is definitely brewing. http://grantmontgomery.blogspot.com/
Posted by grantmont on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 8:36 PM ET
5
Americans should read the British press (Guardian, Independent, BBC) in the least - to get a better look at the other side of the story.
Posted by dirtyharriet0 on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 9:21 PM ET
6
You are a disgrace to intelligent thinking people everywhere. I love the way you try to humanize the innocent arabs. Maybe they have a reason for strapping TNT to their 12 and 13 year old sons and daughters and sending them to Israeli schools. Sure, Arabs are peace loving people.... just don't say anything bad about Muhhamad or they might come after you. I guess, we just need to "see it from their point of view". Maybe when they kill another journalist you'll change your mind. Nah, you probably won't.
Posted by boca_flyboy on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 9:56 PM ET
7
Nice thread.I hope to read more of your dispatches. Thanks and stay safe.
Posted by corics1217 on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 10:19 PM ET
8
This was a good article. As an American who has traveled extensivly in this part of the world I understand to some degree the complexities of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. I urge readers to seek understanding of the people and cultures and not to be taken in by fanatics of either side. The people you read here who are motivated by hatred are the problem. It's up to the rest of us to invite discussion, learn about each others cultures and be open to new ideas.try http://www.musicalmissions.com for some new ideas...
Posted by kristinasophia on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 10:59 PM ET
9
to 8. What exactly is "palestinian culture"? What is palestinian language, history, historical figures. Can you name a few besides Arafat? What has been the capital of the State of Palestine? Has there ever been a "state of palestine"? The answer to all of the above is, of course, negative. These "palestinians" are just Arabs from the surrounding countries, hastily put together as a "nation" by the Arab world as supposed victims of "Israeli aggression", to be used as terrorists and for the purposes of propaganda. To Kevin - you should be ashamed of yourself for attempting to present the views of leftst radicals as though they express the general views of the Israeli population. It's like pretending that Al Sharpton or Cindy Sheehan are spokespeople for the US. It would also be like publishing the views of some Arab that doesn't want to destroy Israel (if you can even find one) as mainstream among those people. This is not responsible journalism.
Posted by asukiennik on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 11:34 PM ET
10
It's amazing how Kevin Sites manages to spin this story by finding two artists oblivious to the real world. Two artists that live in communities as insular as that of the ultra-orthodox Jews or Arabs with their state controlled media. They have to be oblivious because they are able to the situation that has dogged Israel from the beginning. The fact is over 20 countries, including most of Israel's Middle Eastern neighbors, have always refused to recognize Israel's basic right to exist, a right no other country is denied. Not even the Sudanese government which has killed over a million people is denied legitimacy by the same nations that won't let Israel keep it's .01% of the Middle East. So Kevin Sites repeatedly saying "Get over the holocaust, it was decades ago" are unfounded. The threats to Israel's continued existence are very real as long as Iranians seeking nuclear weapons clamor for Israel to be wiped off the map and the terrorist sponsoring Arab league denies Israel's right to be in the ME. Whether the Palestinians are merely tools used by those states that want to complete the Holocaust or if the Palestinian cause is legitimate, the fact is the Palestinians have been misled by warmongers and terrorists. The Palestinian culture of violence makes it too easy for the Israeli public to be convinced by generals and politicians that strong arm tactics are necessary to keep Israeli children safe from suicide school bus bombers and bombers in pizzerias.
Posted by meyerdoodle on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 11:53 PM ET

ALSO ON YAHOO!

One Man. One Year. A World of Conflict.

Kevin's Flickr Photo Journal

Other Trip Posts

Add to My Yahoo!/RSS

  • Add Hot Zone headlines to My Yahoo!

    Add to My Yahoo! xml
» All News RSS Feeds
share this page
Alerts BellAdd an Alert - Receive the latest Hot Zone dispatches by email, instant message or mobile phone.

Learn More


» Web Search: Mideast Conflict

HOW TO HELP

in memoriam

The Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone team dedicates this site to Marla Ruzicka, a fearless voice of compassion, who was killed in Iraq on April 16, 2005, while trying to lessen the suffering of others. For more information, see Civic Worldwide.