HOME

 

NEPAL ARCHIVE: May 14-29, 2006

Where to Mao?

Nepal's Maoist Party has a plan for the country in the aftermath of the Peoples' Movement. But many wonder where it will lead.

By Kevin Sites, Sun May 21, 9:22 PM ET

DHANGADHI, Nepal - Sharad Singh-Bhandari says his younger brother was teaching at a boarding school in western Nepal in 2001 when a squad of Royal Nepalese Army soldiers came to the school and asked for him.

When Singh-Bhandari's brother appeared, they tied one end of a rope around his hands and the other to the back of their truck. After dragging him for a distance, they stopped, untied him and shot him dead in front of the crowd that had gathered. Then they simply drove away.

Someone, says Singh-Bhandari, had told the soldiers that his brother was a communist.

"I've had many brothers killed by the army," says Singh-Bhandari. "But this was the only one connected by blood."

Video

Sharad Singh-Bhandari on the Communist Party of Nepal's philosophy » View

Singh-Bhandari looks crisp and fresh despite the wilting heat of the western plains. He wears a signature white shirt and square frameless glasses that look more Munich-hip than rural Nepal. Though born in western Nepal, he studied commerce at a university in Katmandu.

He has been a member of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) since he was 15 years old. Now, at the age of 30, he is one of ten top regional leaders in the country as the Secretary of the Seti Manhakali Bureau, in far west Nepal, near the border with India.

He says all of his time is spent working for the party, especially now that the Maoists have formed an alliance with seven other political parties, in the aftermath of mass nationwide protests that forced the autocratic king of Nepal to cede power back to a parliament he dissolved in 2002.

The Maoists have put forth a 12-point "Roadmap for Peace" for Nepal and are pushing for the election of a new constituent assembly. They're also calling for their full political integration into a new government and for the military integration of their estimated 20,000-strong People's Liberation Army into a new Nepalese national army.

I sat down to talk with Singh-Bhandari in the courtyard of the Biyad Hotel in the small western Nepalese town of Dhangaghi. We discussed the recent Peoples' Movement, the Maoists' role in a future government, and their adherence to a Maoist communist philosophy in the 21st Century. The following is a partial transcript of the interview.

KEVIN SITES: What role did the Maoists play in the Peoples' Movement, in which Nepalese citizens took to the streets to demand democracy, with the result of nearly two dozen being killed and hundreds wounded, but also the king ceding power back to the parliament he had formerly dissolved?

SHARAD SINGH-BHANDARI: It might seem that the king's been pushed back a few steps, but the realities are actually much different. Many of his concessions are a direct result of the ten-year-old peoples' war we've waged.

The Peoples' Movement, the historical 19-day struggle in Nepal, did play a key role, however, in forcing the king to realize he can't hold power anymore. Our role was very strong during that struggle and if we weren't present, the king would not have taken the steps he did.

Our 12-point "Road Map for Peace" is an example of this. We've made our voices heard. Had we not reached agreement with the other political parties we would not have seen these kind of changes in the country we see today.

SITES: Beyond bringing back parliament, what do you want to see happen?

SINGH-BHANDARI: We are saying that democratic republicanism is necessary to bring back peace in Nepal. But the seven-party alliance seems they are satisfied with just bringing back parliament.

We (the Maoists) believe we should move forward with the election of a constituent assembly after the formation of an interim government.

SITES: Would the Maoists be satisfied with just being part of that elected assembly or would you, as some fear, want to establish a single-party system?

SINGH-BHANDARI: We want a democracy. No imperialistic powers should be under the illusion that Maoists want a one-party dictatorship.

What we are trying to give Nepal is a new concept in that context, especially in the face of the overwhelming influence of imperialism in the world.

SITES: What new concept?

"We are trying to bring a new system that will bring security for all."— Sharad Singh-Bhandari

SINGH-BHANDARI: First, no people around the world should feel the international pressures from imperialist powers.

Second, we want to present another economic solution to the new market orientation which has created problems for people, such as the

International Monetary Fund and the
World Bank
, which is just collecting money centrally and making poor people even poorer.

The final point, and most importantly, we want to implement Marxism, Leninism and Maoism so we can have real social justice in Nepal.

SITES: How will that bring about social justice?

SINGH-BHANDARI: Marxism, Leninism and Maoism give people a different solution after domination by a market-oriented society.

SITES: But the 20th Century is filled with failed communist states. And in this century,

North Korea's people are starving and China has fully embraced capitalism in all but name.

SINGH-BHANDARI: There's an illusion that there's a communist system in North Korea, China and Cambodia. There's no communism in these countries though the world thinks so. But the base of the development of Russia was established under Lenin and Stalin.

And Mao provided the real basis for the development of China, with his polices before 1976.

The current reformists that are revising China's policies are a deviation from the real communism. We have learned from that and have to implement the original Marxism in a new way.

That is why our ten-year's people war has been successful.

SITES: But why model yourself after movements in which millions were killed, both under Stalin and Mao's Cultural Revolution?

SINGH-BHANDARI: That's a fraud. That's a kind of defaming of communism — the massacres of Tiananmen Square were done in the name of communism but it was not communism.

As far as the Cultural Revolution, it was good since it was only the rich that were dealt with.

SITES: People were killed for completely negligible reasons.

SINGH-BHANDARI: No, people weren't killed during the Cultural Revolution, but yes, during Tiananmen.

SITES: People were killed during Mao's Cultural Revolution. A member of my staff's own father was killed as a result of the Cultural Revolution. But I think the point here is, once in power, will you use violence to achieve your social goals and economic goals?

A brigade of Maoist rebels in
western Nepal

SINGH-BHANDARI: There were limitations during those times (Stalin) and you can't find examples of so many people being killed during Mao. But after Mao there were leaders and rulers that carried out those actions. And [during the] time of Stalin more people were killed because of the Second World War.

But our party in Nepal is moving ahead, reforming and learning lessons from those past limitations.

SITES: So you're saying that the middle class, the educated and businesspeople don't have anything to fear from your potential participation in a new government?

SINGH-BHANDARI: No one should fear — not the middle class, not the higher class, not even capitalists — just the feudals. What we are trying to bring is the new system that will bring security for all, even the middle class and capitalists. Security for everyone.

SITES: By feudals, who are you referring to?

SINGH-BHANDARI: In context to Nepal, this deals with the monarchy and powers associated with that.

SITES: How will you deal with the monarchists in the advent of real democracy in Nepal?

SINGH-BHANDARI: We will do what the Nepalese people demand and what our party requires, although that hasn't been determined yet.

SITES: In this ten-year civil war, international monitors say there have been numerous human rights abuses, both by the Royal Nepalese Army and by the Maoists.

Do you agree with this assessment and do you think there should be a truth commission like the one set up in South Africa, post apartheid, to investigate these cases?

SINGH-BHANDARI: Absolutely. We believe the abuses that have occurred on our side were not a matter of policy but have been done by individuals acting independently. However, we think all the allegations of human rights abuses, including those by the feudal forces (Royal Nepalese Army) should be investigated.

SITES: What about the land that the Maoists have seized from individuals in the course of your rebellion?

SINGH-BHANDARI: All the land that has been seized will be returned, with the exception of feudalists, and those owning more than 100 acres. We will return them all.

SITES: What about the so-called "donations" the Maoists have extracted from the population — what others call extortion — to support your cause?

SINGH-BHANDARI: We have formed a separate government and a separate army. People will be influenced by the policies of that government which requires funding.

We don't have a policy of terrorizing people by extorting money from them forcefully.

But we do have sister organizations that collect from people willing to support us. For example we recently raised money for those injured in the Peoples' Movement.

SITES: How optimistic are you that the democracy movement will take root and that there will be peace in Nepal?

SINGH-BHANDARI: We are very hopeful that the seven-party alliance, along with Maoists, will move ahead successfully, but only if there is no interference from foreign powers and the palace (the king). We will be able to establish a democratic republic in Nepal.

But if there is interference in the form of a coup, the first step will be to take to the streets again in peaceful protests like we did during the Peoples' Movement. After that we have to see what happens.

SITES: When you say "interference from foreign powers," the Maoists usually seem to be referring to the United States. What's your concern there?

SINGH-BHANDARI: America has been supplying the feudal forces (Royal Nepalese Army) with arms, training, vehicles, petrol, for years.

Without that, our forces would've defeated them years ago. The American people and foreign people should understand, Nepal wants peace and the army doesn't need more arms.

For more information on the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoists) see their website.


http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs4485

RECOMMEND THIS STORY

Recommend It:

Average (Not Rated)

0.0 stars
Hot Zone Watch List
  • Algeria
  • Angola
  • Burundi
  • Chad
  • Ivory Coast
  • Korean Peninsula
  • Liberia
  • Nigeria
  • Peru
  • The Philippines
  • Thailand
  • Uzbekistan
  • Zimbabwe

Comments

Join the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

1
Historically, change always comes from the bottom simply because the top does not want to change. It will be interesting to follow this fellow Sharad Singh-Bhandari and see how this all plays out in Nepal, and most importantly as Kevin put it "once in power, will [the Maoists party] use violence to achieve social goals and economic goals?" Neither history not present-day Communist parties seem to offer much hope. http://grantmontgomery.blogspot.com/
Posted by grantmont on Sun, May 21, 2006 11:23 PM ET
2
From an article by Noam Chomsky, “Millennial Visions and Selective Vision, Part One,” Z Magazine (January 10, 2000). “in India the democratic capitalist ‘experiment’ since 1947 has caused more deaths than in the entire history of the ‘colossal, wholly failed…experiment’ of communism everywhere since 1917: over 100 million deaths by 1979, tens of millions more since, in India alone.” quoted in "Socialism Is Much Better Than Capitalism, And Communism Will Be a Far Better World PART 15: The Cultural Revolution: Health Care and the Economy" http://rwor.org/a/046/health-care-economy.html#chomsky
Posted by bigbopper98118 on Mon, May 22, 2006 1:38 AM ET
3
"No, people weren't killed during the Cultural Revolution, but yes, during Tiananmen." I'm astounded by this comment, Mao's Cultural Revolution killed millions of Chinese and thanks to Communism many in China still don't know the root of all the deaths: Mao's lunacy. Capitalism today is a far cry from Smith's intent, but at least there is transparency and personal freedom. Thanks Kevin, I pray that countries in crisis will find peaceful, beneficial solutions for a better future for all.
Posted by rscottpearce on Mon, May 22, 2006 3:26 AM ET
4
thanks for your wonderfol covareg kavin.but what i think is ( i'am nepali also )genrel nepali thingking defrently then all those politecal party thing.i think this revolution is frastaions from all nepali they don't belive or trust any party but thay want change.now they giving a one more chance to do or to bring peace and low and order so they can live as they want. raju subedi.
Posted by subedijon on Mon, May 22, 2006 7:42 AM ET
5
The new President of Italy is a former Communist who fought against the Fascists during W.W.II. Are the "foreign forces" going to shoot him too?
Posted by braveland1 on Mon, May 22, 2006 10:44 AM ET
6
Very, very interesting article, gaining insight into how one of the top leaders thinks in the Maoist party. However, it doesn't really give me much hope for peace for Nepal, considering the ideology that this guy, and I'm assuming the other leaders in his party, espouses. Thanks again Kevin for great reporting - I'm going to be really sad when your reporting for Yahoo ends.
Posted by lauren_taggart1 on Mon, May 22, 2006 10:46 AM ET
7
I am Chinese. Yes, so many people were committed suicide in Culture Revolution. Can you imagine how the spiritual attack killed people? Communists are very keen in mental torment.
Posted by sifansz on Mon, May 22, 2006 11:17 AM ET
8
IF I TYPE MY RESPONSE IN ALL CAPS WITHOUT MUCH PUNCTUATION WILL I SEEM SMARTER OR MORE STUPID? OR JUST THAT I AM SHOUTING. What the above "friendly neighbor" does not seem to understand is that " THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES banding THEMSELVES TOGETHER AND FORMing SOLIDARITY RELATIONSHIPS, ... IN MATTERS OF TRADE AND FINANCE is just MORE IMPERIAL BULL-PUCKY. It's all well and good to talk about the crimes of "IMPERIALISM" but I haven't heard even the hint of a viable alternative to market-driven economies. And to hear a leader of the Mao-vadi seriously say that the Tienemen Square massacres (perhaps thousands of innocent people) were "bad" but the "cultural revolution massacres (millions and millions) were "good" is really too much. Makes me think the Maoists are no more educated than the King's court. How can we even talkk of a "Peace Plan" when you have Maoists who want to purge the imperialists, a King who wants to eliminate those same maoists, and a bunch of corrupt politicians trying to forge a "democratic republic" where they all have a slice of petty bureaucrat heaven? Sorry, but Nepal is in for a world of pain for some time to come. A peaceful, representative democratic nation is NOT just around the corner.
Posted by mofotovaughan on Mon, May 22, 2006 12:07 PM ET
9
Excellent questioning Keith. It's easy to see here how the Marxist/Leninists even believe their own brainwashing. Too bad this idiocy still lives on at Yale, Harvard, Cambridge and Oxford. As to Fascism vs. Communism, I think anyone who has read The Road to Surfdom would know that the two systems are twins of the same mother . . . jealous twins, but brothers just the same. God help capitalism, the only and last refuge of free men.
Posted by sportduc620 on Mon, May 22, 2006 12:09 PM ET
10
You know, I think this friendlyneighbor12 guy is a total fraud and just cutting and pasting crap from his high-school term paper. Let's expunge his diatribe and get back to an actual discussion of Nepal. I would venture to say he has never even been near south asia if he is still spouting all this idealistic blather about commonism. I have spent enough time "on the ground" in Russia, China, Laos, and Burma to see how well communist-socialism actually works. In real life, it just sucks for the average person. Certainly no better than crapitolism and usually a lot more repressive. That's just the way it IS. Sorry if it dosen't match your idealistic theory. If you don't believe it, then imagine opening up the borders and tell me how many would leave a free-market society and permanently move into a state controlled society. If you think Cuba or Laos or North Korea will be hit with a massive wave of happy and hopeful immigrants, you are just wrong.
Posted by reality.czecs on Mon, May 22, 2006 3:46 PM ET

ALSO ON YAHOO!

One Man. One Year. A World of Conflict.

Kevin's Flickr Photo Journal

Other Trip Posts

Add to My Yahoo!/RSS

  • Add Hot Zone headlines to My Yahoo!

    Add to My Yahoo! xml
» All News RSS Feeds
share this page
Alerts BellAdd an Alert - Receive the latest Hot Zone dispatches by email, instant message or mobile phone.

Learn More


  • United We Blog! for a Democratic Nepal - this pioneering blog in Nepal rose to popularity by bringing out information about the pro-democracy movement, avoiding censorship when mainstream media in early 2005 were working under government restrictions. Run by a group of journalists associated with various Kathmandu newspapers, the site contains lots of information about the ongoing political transformation in Nepal with photo features and details about April's 'Peoples' Movement' that forced the king to cede absolute power and restore parliament.
  • BBC: Nepal - includes a map, political history, and a timeline of key events.
  • Wikipedia: Nepal - includes sections on the Kingdom's history, politics, and its demographics.
  • Wikipedia: Nepal Civil War - provides a background to the conflict between Nepal's government and Maoist rebels.
  • U.N. Information Platform: Nepal - provides reports on security incidents, humanitarian, and development issues in Nepal.
  • BBC: Nepal Royal Massacre - looks back at the 2001 murder of Nepal's king and queen by the crown prince.
» Web Search: Nepal

HOW TO HELP

  • Red Cross in Nepal - aims to assist those injured, displaced, or otherwise affected by the conflict.
  • Doctors Without Borders: Nepal - aids people displaced by the conflict between the monarch-led government and Maoist guerrilla forces.
  • MAITI Nepal - works to protect Nepali girls and women from trafficking, and rescuing and rehabilitating victims of the flesh trade.
  • Terre des Hommes: Nepal - provides direct assistance to children at risk of prostitution, forced labor, and child marriage.
  • Human Rights Watch: Nepal - bulletins and in-depth reports on the human rights developments in the country.

in memoriam

The Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone team dedicates this site to Marla Ruzicka, a fearless voice of compassion, who was killed in Iraq on April 16, 2005, while trying to lessen the suffering of others. For more information, see Civic Worldwide.