HOME

 

MYANMAR ARCHIVE: June 27 - July 10 2006

Death Grip

Despite international calls for reform, the ever-defiant SPDC maintains control over Myanmar with an Orwellian hand. Secrecy and paranoia abound, while rubbing elbows with Asia’s powerhouse nations keeps the regime in charge.

By Erin Green, Thu Jul 6, 6:10 PM ET

North Korea has Kim Jong Il. Myanmar has Than Shwe.

The leaders' quirks may not manifest themselves the same way (Kim is a Hollywood junkie, while Than Shwe has a tendency to make national decisions based on astrological charts). But like Kim, Than Shwe's rule has been marked by totalitarian oppression, confounding public declarations and a capacity to rile the international community.

SPDC Chairman Than Shwe

Than Shwe is the chairman of the ruling military junta in Myanmar, the country formerly known as Burma. Billed as the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), the group is known for being as proud as it is merciless. Ruling Myanmar through fear and military might, the SPDC stifles democracy and kills opposition figures, intent on only one thing: staying in power.

Despite heavy international pressure for reform, that hold on power today is firm, thanks in part to some powerful allies.

Since the SPDC assumed control in 1988, Myanmar has received over $2 billion worth of weapons from China. The regime also has forged close military ties with Russia and is broadening economic ties with India and other nations in the region.

The regime came into power amid a violent crackdown against pro-democracy protesters. The then-ruling socialist regime had precipitated total economic failure in Burma, and the Burmese people took to the streets of the capital Rangoon (now Yangon) to protest for change.

The Burmese military used the chaos to depose the socialist regime and silence the political demonstrators, killing thousands, to become Myanmar's ruling party. The new ruling junta called itself the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC), changing the name to the SPDC in 1997 — ostensibly indicating democratic sympathies that never materialized.

Myanmar did hold elections in 1990, in which the National League for Democracy, led by Myanmar's legendary voice of democracy, Aung San Suu Kyi, won in a landslide.

But Suu Kyi, the daughter of Burma's independence hero, Aung San, was never allowed to lead. The SPDC refused to recognize the results and put her and hundreds of other political activists under arrest. Many of them, including Suu Kyi, have spent the majority of their lives in detention since then.

Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi

To maintain control after their takeover as Myanmar's ruling party, Than Shwe and the SPDC have made a series of increasingly xenophobic moves in the name of the Burmese people.

"They thought ... that they needed more flavoring of Burma from a Burman point of view," Josef Silverstein, professor emeritus at Rutgers University and author of several books on Myanmar, explains. This included changing the country's name from Burma to Myanmar, reflecting the Burman pronunciation of the name over the British interpretation.

Silverstein says changes like this reflect the SPDC's belief that the final Burman royal dynasty before British rule, the Konbaung, was "the true spirit ... of the traditions of Burma, and they have a mission to pass them on to future generations."

This narrowly-focused view of Burmese nationalism leaves Myanmar's ethnic minorities — about 30 percent of the population — to fend for themselves as refugees, or to live under constant threat of state action.

The regime expects total commitment from all of Myanmar, including ethnic minorities, in its efforts to isolate the country. This was demonstrated in a 2003 message from Than Shwe in commemoration of "Peasant's Day."

The message read in part: "The entire mass of national races including the peasants will have to harmoniously strive for emergence of a peaceful, modern and developed nation."

Those who don't follow the chairman's words to "harmoniously strive" for a unified Myanmar can expect swift and painful retribution. Suu Kyi's current incarceration came after the SPDC used thugs to attack her convoy in 2003, leaving at least 70 dead. Human Rights Watch reported in May that the Burmese army began "its largest offensive in the western and northern parts of the Karen state," looting and burning homes while planting anti-personnel land mines in civilian areas "to terrorize the local population." Over 1,000 political prisoners remain detained without judicial recourse. Summary executions continue to be reported and in March Yangon officials beat a former political prisoner to death in public.

This flagrant abuse of human rights has led 34 countries to support a

United Nations resolution calling for democratic reforms, but there is a major roadblock: China.

Myanmar's natural resources, including stores of natural gas, and convenient location next to the Bay of Bengal have bought the SPDC favor with China, a country with veto power on the UN Security Council.

Silverstein says China has a vested interest in making the Burmese military an ally and is granting its neighbor favors in the process. Armed with such leverage, the regime has been able to maintain that the international community should stay out of Burmese affairs.

Diplomats have little room to maneuver, and though the U.S. is leading the charge against Myanmar at the U.N., a State Department official would not give specific details about progress on introducing a resolution. 

The media-savvy regime is conscious of international scorn. The state-censored newspaper, the Myanmar Times, touts the country's good standing in the world, proclaiming Myanmar has been "dutiful in launching democratic revolution." In reality, the regime's "road map" to democracy is dismissed almost universally as a sham.

While evidence of reform has been almost nonexistent, evidence of paranoia run amok is readily available. In November 2005, the SPDC announced it was moving the capital from Yangon to Pyinmana, in remote central Myanmar. Theories for the move abound, but Silverstein says some speculate the superstitious Than Shwe got a bad astrological reading (many in Myanmar heed the advice of fortune tellers and the country even has a government-sanctioned Astrology Research Bureau).

Silverstein also notes that the junta perhaps began to believe its own rumor about a possible U.S. invasion, moving the capital as a defensive measure.

Until the international community can act, the Burmese people continue to watch Than Shwe and the SPDC for clues about the country's future. The news magazine Irrawaddy, operated by Burmese exiles in Thailand, has even set up an online feature called "Than Shwe Watch" to "follow his movements, his decisions, statements" in hopes of yielding "clues about the future course of Burma."

With a secretive and strategically adept regime like the SPDC, tracking Than Shwe's every move may be the only chance to ascertain what lies ahead.

http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs7272

RECOMMEND THIS STORY

Recommend It:

Average (Not Rated)

0.0 stars
Hot Zone Watch List
  • Algeria
  • Angola
  • Burundi
  • Chad
  • Ivory Coast
  • Korean Peninsula
  • Liberia
  • Nigeria
  • Peru
  • The Philippines
  • Thailand
  • Uzbekistan
  • Zimbabwe

Comments

Join the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

1
Seems like this is a situation that warrants continued and vigilant attention. Praise to such a staff for bringing such issues to the forefront.
Posted by vazunaruh on Thu, Jul 6, 2006 6:39 PM ET
2
Burma's military regime is able to last until today mainly because it continues to be propped up by China, which blocks all measures against the regime in the UN. Why does China, a totalitarian rogue nation with no respect for human rights, continue to hold veto power anyway? China should be removed from the security council as soon as possible.
Posted by w_general on Fri, Jul 7, 2006 12:21 AM ET
3
While Burma seems impervious to foreign intervention, the reality is that politicians prefer to listen to their corporate interests rather than uphold principles. What might be needed is for more people to join the Burma campaign here http://www.burmacampaign.org.uk/index.php.
Posted by miamisoftware on Fri, Jul 7, 2006 1:18 AM ET
4
Neither China or Russia should hold veto power.Their decisions have nothing to do with human rights although the the U.S. looks the other way at abuses in both these countries yet continue to have strong diplomatic ties with them. Sad for the Burmese people. It is refreshing though to hear that the refugee camps are well run and they have enough food and medication. These NGO's should be put in charge at refugee camps in Darfur and other substandard camps
Posted by warriorforjesus2005 on Fri, Jul 7, 2006 7:03 AM ET
5
After living my whole life in a country where it is almost a national passtime to criticize the government, it is very dificult to accept that others live under extreme totalitarianism. I know that it happens, but the whole concept of a nation of people following the dicates of a man who makes decisions not using logic, but by the stars, seems unreal. Until I started reading The Hot Zone, I didn't even know some of these countries had conflicts. Now that I know how much of the world is actually fighting I have to wonder if we could put together a council of Doctors and Scientists to find a cure for Politics. "Politics" seems to be killing more people than AIDS and with about as much reason and logic.
Posted by smalltownwench65 on Fri, Jul 7, 2006 9:26 AM ET
6
It is a sad day for the international community, because you have millions of people suffering from the dictators like Than Shaw in Burma and Kim Jong Sick in N. Korea trying to shot missile to the United Sates (Hawaii/Alaska). In the mean time, the UN is still looking for the definition for “suffering”, “sanction”, “oppression”, and “genocide”. If we all think that what is happing in Burma and N. Korea is none of our business, one day we as an international community would pay serious consequences for our own ignorance and selfishness. To add more to the previous comment, “Politics” does not kill people; Stupid/Ignorance leaders from the international community are to be blame for the dead of millions of people. In fact, we need politics as much as we need “Fire”, but they are both equally dangerous in the hand of evil leaders as we have seen enough in the course of history. The cure for “Politics” has been long discovered by mankind, and it is call “principle”, “unity”, “compassion” and “altruism”, however so call leader of the international community (i.e., China/Russia) embodies by the UN is consciously choosing “politic” as an alternative, and rest of the world do or say nothing about it. As a result, we will see more people suffer around the world.
Posted by myanmar_13 on Fri, Jul 7, 2006 2:49 PM ET
7
Isn't it ironic that U.S. diplomacy handles threats/terrorism/internal gross injustices with military backing (i.e. radical extremists/terror states like Aghanistan and Iraq), while these same conditions exist with states like Burma and North Korea. Why do we give these Asian countries a diplomatic pass, while Southwest Asian/Middle East countries are purported to be more of a Western threat? This dichotomy is stunning. Ever since the incident in Tiannanmen Square in 1989 in China, their position on the security council should have be revoked and economic sanctions should have been placed upon them. And now they threaten Taiwan...appease these powers with diplomatic talks and an even greater threat may come from East Asia than from the Middle East.
Posted by opincar27 on Fri, Jul 7, 2006 3:55 PM ET
8
You ask a legitimate question opincar27. As for Afghanistan, well, they harbored the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden, which have proved to be direct threats to the American people. Though certainly no friend of the US or Israel, Saddam turned out to be not nearly as threatening. He was more on the level of Kim, except that he doesn't have a nuke program like Kim does. The Iraqi people, on the other hand, are sitting on the world's second largest known reserves of oil. N. Korea, Mynamar, Nepal and Sudan are not. One of the possible benefits of Mr. Sites reports is that it opens the eyes of democratic peoples to the fact that we are in the minority. Most governments are not truly democratic and are repressive, though some more than others. So, the idea that America or the EU or any other coalition should be the world's military vanguard spreadying democracy ( a view held with almost absolute certainty by the neoconservatives like Cheney and Jeb Bush -- who are pretty much running the US right now -- should be held up for serious scrutiny by the American people in particular, because now we're getting a glimpse of just how gigantic a task being the world's democracy police actually is). This is why such a role could actually be more of a cover for the ruling elite oil-barrons and Fortune 500 company families to increase their wealth and grab as much of the world's resources as they can manage, using as many young, middle-class and poor people as they can find who are willing to put their bodies on the line in the belief that they are fighting for democracy. Welcome to reality.
Posted by liberalnproudofit on Fri, Jul 7, 2006 7:18 PM ET
9
What you miss, Liberalandproudofit, Is that the source of poverty in the world are these oppressive dictators who absorb their nation's wealth and deny the freedoms we enjoy to serve their own selfish purposes or madness. One must look at the free world as the solution to that oppression and not the root cause. You are blinded by the political prizm you use to view the world. These Dictators around the world will continue to oppress the people under them regardless of you getting what YOU want on election day. It is people like the President and my fellow servicemembers who do the dirty work of freeing people and tolerating your dissent and desire to ignore the problem.
Posted by bigdan6974 on Fri, Jul 7, 2006 7:38 PM ET
10
I couldn't agree with you more bigdan6974, personally i feel that if we are going to be globo cop we might as well go all out, mountains in Afghanistan should become valleys, and houses craters untill the threat is eliminated.
Posted by mab0088 on Fri, Jul 7, 2006 7:53 PM ET

ALSO ON YAHOO!

One Man. One Year. A World of Conflict.

Kevin's Flickr Photo Journal

Other Trip Posts

Add to My Yahoo!/RSS

  • Add Hot Zone headlines to My Yahoo!

    Add to My Yahoo! xml
» All News RSS Feeds
share this page
Alerts BellAdd an Alert - Receive the latest Hot Zone dispatches by email, instant message or mobile phone.

Learn More


» Web Search: Myanmar

HOW TO HELP

  • Red Cross in Myanmar - provides for the basic health, water, and sanitation needs of people in selected villages, and works to protect civilians in sensitive areas.
  • Doctors Without Borders: Myanmar - centers projects around those living with malaria, tuberculosis, and sexually transmitted infections including HIV/AIDS.
  • Save the Children: Myanmar - works to provide children with access to quality education, adequate healthcare, and economic security.
  • U.N. Refugee Agency: Myanmar - works to safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees.
  • U.N. Development Programme: Myanmar - focuses activities on areas of poverty reduction, local governance, the environment, and HIV/AIDS in order to boost the well being of the people.
  • Human Rights Watch: Myanmar - bulletins and in-depth reports on the human rights developments in the country.
  • Clear Path International - works with land mine and bomb survivors, their families and their communities on the Thai-Myanmar border, Vietnam and Cambodia.

in memoriam

The Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone team dedicates this site to Marla Ruzicka, a fearless voice of compassion, who was killed in Iraq on April 16, 2005, while trying to lessen the suffering of others. For more information, see Civic Worldwide.