HOME

 

MIDEAST CRISIS ARCHIVE: July 23 - Aug. 23, 2006

An Unfinished Life

An Israeli soldier is buried on the kibbutz where he lived, just a day before a cease-fire is slated to begin.

By Kevin Sites, Mon Aug 14, 6:00 AM ET

HAIFA,

Israel - There is a special resting place for fallen soldiers at the cemetery in Kibbutz Nachsholim, a communal farm near the city of Haifa.

It is on a small hilltop, under an elm tree, 150 yards from the gently breaking waves of the Mediterranean.

This is where 19-year-old Ya'ar Ben-Giat is being buried Sunday.

Photos

Friends, family and fellow soldiers mourn Ya'ar Ben-Giat. » View

He was killed in south Lebanon on Saturday, along with 23 other soldiers from the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in the worst single day of fatalities for Israel since the start of their month-long offensive against Hezbollah.

And in an irony befitting this conflict filled with tragic missteps, these deaths occurred while both Israel and Hezbollah intensified their fighting, trying to solidify their positions prior to a

United Nations cease-fire slated to begin on Monday.

In the late afternoon, family and friends began to gather at the kibbutz. While Ben-Giat's unit is still fighting in south Lebanon, many of those he went to basic training with have come to pay their respects — young men and women, barely out of high school, dressed in the olive green uniforms and light green berets of the IDF infantry.

"We would get weekends off, but Sunday we had to be back at camp," says Dave Rosenberg, a soldier who went through basic training with Ben-Giat. "Everyone would always be depressed on that day, myself included, because we didn't want to be back in uniform. But when Ya'ar showed up, seeing his smile would make everything better. If I would have to describe him I would say he was innocent like a child. In his last phone call to his mother he asked for a Sony PlayStation."

But according to others in the unit, he also had a strong sense of duty.

"He wanted to stand out as a soldier," says Ortal Eliyahu, an administrator in the unit. "He was supposed to go to a non-commissioned officer course. But after the war began, he decided he didn't want to go because it would take him out of the action. He wanted to be on the front line. He wanted to fight. He was a good kibbutz guy."

Israel's kibbutzim were once places of vigorous social idealism, where families raised their children with the values of hard work during the day and spirited intellectual and political discourse in the evening.

And while many of the kibbutzim have become commercialized, turned into hotels and retreats, some residents still feel they and the people who still live there embody the real heart of Israel.

For the Ben-Giat family, that idealism never disappeared and was reflected even in the names of their children. Ya'ar means forest in Hebrew. His 16-year-old sister is named Nof, which means landscape.

"We have fish ponds on the kibbutz," said Ya'ar's mother in an interview on Israeli radio, "but now there will be a new pond for Ya'ar — a pond full of tears."

Video

Israeli reservist Ya'ar Ben-Giat, 19, is buried at the Kibbutz Nachsholim near Haifa Sunday. » View

Tanya Cohen was one of Ya'ar Ben-Giat's high school teachers at the Carmel Beach District School.

"He used to dress like a loveable slob," she says, "always kind of a mess. And sometimes it seemed like he was sleeping during class, but strangely we would find out he was listening to every word and he remembered everything. He had an amazing memory."

Cohen says he also got involved in film classes and enjoyed shooting video and editing short films.

Patricio Weinberg, another soldier in Ben-Giat's basic training unit, was one of his closest friends. He weeps throughout the ceremony.

At first, the army wouldn't let Ben-Giat go inside Lebanon and he was very angry because that was what he was trained to do. "But then he convinced them," says Weinberg. "We rented an apartment on the kibbutz together. We even painted it the weekend before he went into Lebanon."

One by one wreaths of flowers are laid over the casket draped with the Israeli flag. There is a wreath from the IDF, another from the Northern Command, from Ben-Giat's Nachal Brigade, then his battalion, and so on, as well as the kibbutz and other civilian organizations, family and personal friends — all laid over the casket until it disappears completely under the pile of flowers.

"God full of mercy sitting high above," says the rabbi presiding over the ceremony, "please give him rest."

As the ceremony continues, air raid sirens begin to blare and, within moments, there is a muffled explosion on a distant ridgeline, followed by a rising plume of gray smoke.

Immediately mourners turn toward the impact — one of more than 250 rockets Hezbollah fired into northern Israel Sunday. One death was reported from the barrage of rebel rockets.  

They point and murmur among themselves, forgetting the funeral for a moment. Many pull cell phones from their purses or pockets, calling their children, friends or relatives, telling them to go to the bomb shelters.

Eventually they turn back to the ceremony. A popular song for troubled times is played over the loudspeakers — a small prayer for peace.

"It's not a dream, the day shall come," the song goes. "The day for which we've waited 2,000 years has arrived. The last war. We will go back home. We will go back to our friends. We will take off our olive-colored uniforms and wait for other days to come."

When the funeral ends, there is no 21-gun salute, as is usually the tradition. Some say it wouldn't be wise during a time when there is already so much gunfire.

Young soldiers, many who haven't seen each other since basic training, hold each other tightly, promising to stay in touch, exchanging phone numbers.

Some just sit or stand with their arms wrapped around themselves.

Patricio Weinberg, one of Ben-Giat's
closest friends

"He was a free guy, very laid back," says Weinberg of his friend. "All the rules and regulations, the physical challenges, never bothered him. He was so easygoing."

Weinberg says Ben-Giat was kind, and always a good soldier, always on his toes. He tells a story about him before start of the latest fighting in Lebanon.

"We were posted near Ramallah, and Ya'ar and I were left by ourselves to guard a group of Arab suspects. It was hot out and they were thirsty so Ya'ar was letting them drink from his canteen," says Weinberg. "But then one of them picked up a rock and threatened him. We both trained our weapons on him until he dropped it. It was just one of those moments."

The IDF says Ya'ar Ben-Giat was killed in the village of Randuria, Lebanon, after confronting a Hezbollah fighter.

But for Weinberg and Ben-Giat's other friends, it is his life, not the details of his death, they want to dwell on at his funeral.

"I was talking to him on the telephone about a week ago," Weinberg says. "We were saying how after a few years we would move to a big city and maybe open up a pub."

He pauses, eyes welling up with tears that, for the moment, do not fall.


Previous: The Ground War
http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs8518

RECOMMEND THIS STORY

Recommend It:

Average (Not Rated)

0.0 stars
Hot Zone Watch List
  • Algeria
  • Angola
  • Burundi
  • Chad
  • Ivory Coast
  • Korean Peninsula
  • Liberia
  • Nigeria
  • Peru
  • The Philippines
  • Thailand
  • Uzbekistan
  • Zimbabwe

Comments

Join the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

1
A ceasefire could have happened weeks ago. The US has the necessary financial leverage over Israel, and therefore the power to broker peace. Israel’s foreign policy and military strategy is dependent on the approval of the United States. Though Israel ranks 23rd on the global development index – above Greece, Singapore, Portugal and Brunei – it remains the world’s largest recipient of US aid. However, Israel does not depend economically on this assistance.Most of the money given by the US Foreign Military Financing program – in common with all US aid disbursements – is spent in the United States. Israel uses it to obtain F15 and F16 jets, Apache, Cobra and Blackhawk helicopters, AGM, AIM and Patriot missiles, M-16 rifles, M-204 grenade launchers and M-2 machine guns. As the Prestwick scandal in England revealed, laser-guided bombs, even now, are being sent to Israel from the United States. Many of these weapons have been used to kill civilians in Lebanon Why doesn’t someone stop the violence? –It’s too profitable to the military industrial complex. http://grant-ontgomery.blogspot.com/
Posted by grantmont on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:00 AM ET
2
It's the family and friends who know best that war is hell. But just a few miles away, there's been virtually no media covering the Palestinian territories in recent weeks. Focused on the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, mainstream media is largely ignoring the nearly one-sided war with Gaza. U.N. humanitarian agencies report: In just over the last month, the Israeli military has fired on average 200-250 artillery shells per day into the Gaza Strip and conducted at least 220 aerial bombings. 175 Palestinians have been killed, including approximately 40 children and eight women, and over 620 injured in the Gaza Strip. Meanwhile, one IDF soldier has been killed and 25 Israelis have been injured, including 11 Israelis injured by homemade rockets fired from the Gaza Strip. Since the Palestinians don't have the same type of supply line as Israel, they have fired on average 8-9 homemade rockets per day towards Israel (319 in total). David and Goliath in reverse? http://grant-montgomery.blogspot.com/
Posted by grantmont on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:06 AM ET
3
Grantmont, thank you for your factual post. It saddens me to see how the Palestinians have suffered for years. This suffering has gone un-noticed by most for far too long. One can only hope for a peaceful life for the Palestinians.
Posted by get_out_of_lebanon on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:16 AM ET
4
We in the States been fed the line that this war in Lebanon was a result of an unprovoked attack by Hezbollah. Since the mainstream US press basically just feeds the stories they are handed by Israel's press, here's an insightful article from the British press that challenges that mindset. Israel’s assault on Lebanon was premeditated – their two soldiers being captured simply provided the excuse. Since Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon in May 2000, there have been hundreds of violations of the "blue line" between the two countries. The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (Unifil) reports that Israeli aircraft crossed the line "on an almost daily basis" between 2001 and 2003, and "persistently" until 2006. In October 2000, the Israel Defence Forces shot at unarmed Palestinian demonstrators on the border, killing three and wounding 20. In response, Hizbullah crossed the line and kidnapped three Israeli soldiers. On several occasions, Hizbullah fired missiles and mortar rounds at IDF positions, and the IDF responded with heavy artillery and sometimes aerial bombardment. Incidents like this killed three Israelis and three Lebanese in 2003; one Israeli soldier and two Hizbullah fighters in 2005; and two Lebanese people and three Israeli soldiers in February 2006. Rockets were fired from Lebanon into Israel several times in 2004, 2005 and 2006, on some occasions by Hizbullah. But, the UN records, "none of the incidents resulted in a military escalation". [OK, here's the reason Hezbollah captured the two Israeli soldiers:] Hizbullah was seeking to exchange them for the 15 prisoners of war taken by the Israelis during the occupation of Lebanon and (in breach of article 118 of the third Geneva convention) never released. It seems clear that if Israel had handed over the prisoners, it would - without the spillage of any more blood - have retrieved its men and reduced the likelihood of further kidnappings. But the Israeli government refused to negotiate. Instead - well, we all know what happened instead. Almost 1,000 Lebanese and 33 Israeli civilians have been killed so far, and a million Lebanese displaced from their homes. So yes, on July 12, Hizbullah did fire the first shots. But that act of aggression was simply one instance in a long sequence of small incursions and attacks over the past six years by both sides. So why was the Israeli response so different from all that preceded it? The answer is that it was not a reaction to the events of that day. The assault had been planned for months. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that "more than a year ago, a senior Israeli army officer began giving PowerPoint presentations, on an off-the-record basis, to US and other diplomats, journalists and thinktanks, setting out the plan for the current operation in revealing detail". The attack, he said, would last for three weeks. It would begin with bombing and culminate in a ground invasion. The New Statesman's editor, John Kampfner, says he was told by more than one official source that the US government knew in advance of Israel's intention to take military action in Lebanon. The Bush administration told the British government. It is not hard to answer the question of what we could have done. First, stop recruiting enemies, by withdrawing from the occupied territories in Palestine and Syria. Second, stop provoking the armed groups in Lebanon with violations of the blue line - in particular the persistent flights across the border. Third, release the prisoners of war who remain unlawfully incarcerated in Israel. Fourth, continue to defend the border, while maintaining the diplomatic pressure on Lebanon to disarm Hizbullah (as anyone can see, this would be much more feasible if the occupations were to end). [Excerpt of an article by George Monbiot, The Guardian]
Posted by grantmont on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:21 AM ET
5
I believe it was once said by Golda Meir, "We shall someday forgive you for killing our sons, but we shall never forgive you for making us kill yours." Before you dump all over Israel, why dont you ask Hezbollah and Hamas why the fire on Israelis from residential areas? They know full well that Israel has the right to return fire and that they will do so. Hezbollah and Hamas both know that innocents will be killed. It has long been the tactic of weak men to fight like cowards. Hezbollah and Hamas are such cowards
Posted by tonycobxy@verizon.net on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:27 AM ET
6
"why dont you ask Hezbollah and Hamas why the fire on Israelis from residential areas?" Well, unfortunately both sides seem to do so. Israel has located most of its army camps, weapons factories and military installations near or inside civilian communities.
Posted by grantmont on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:34 AM ET
7
The British press reported that 12 Israeli soldiers who were killed last Sunday in Kfar Giladi by a Hizbullah rocket were, under UN humanitarian chief Egeland’s definition, “cowardly blending” with the civilian population of that community. We know there are still civilians in Giladi because their response to the rocket barrage was quoted in the Israeli media. Also are you aware that Israel’s military censor prevents foreign journalists based in Israel from discussing where Hezbollah rockets are landing, and what they may be aimed at. Under the censorship rules, It is impossible to mention any issue that touches on Israeli security or defence matters: the location of military installations, for example, cannot be divulged. It is arguable whether it would actually be possible to report a Hezbollah strike that hit a military site inside Israel.
Posted by grantmont on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:40 AM ET
8
Nice try grantmont, but Israel never launched 3000 rockets or artillery rounds from Grandma Golda's back yard. Don't you dare equate how Israel fights with how it's enemies fight. That dog just don't hunt.
Posted by tonycobxy@verizon.net on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:42 AM ET
9
BTW, not that the British press is unbiased, but it goes without saying that the US press, especially TV where the majority of folks go to for programing (excuse the pun!) is incredibly so. I believe it was Gore Vidal who said, "The corporate grip on opinion in the United States is one of the wonders of the Western world. No First World country has ever managed to eliminate so entirely from its media all objectivity - much less dissent." http://grantmontgomery.blogspot.com/
Posted by grantmont on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:48 AM ET
10
And with that last thought to ponder, I bid you a Good Night!
Posted by grantmont on Mon, Aug 14, 2006 12:50 AM ET

ALSO ON YAHOO!

One Man. One Year. A World of Conflict.

Kevin's Flickr Photo Journal

Other Trip Posts

Add to My Yahoo!/RSS

  • Add Hot Zone headlines to My Yahoo!

    Add to My Yahoo! xml
» All News RSS Feeds
share this page
Alerts BellAdd an Alert - Receive the latest Hot Zone dispatches by email, instant message or mobile phone.

Learn More


» Web Search: Lebanon

HOW TO HELP

in memoriam

The Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone team dedicates this site to Marla Ruzicka, a fearless voice of compassion, who was killed in Iraq on April 16, 2005, while trying to lessen the suffering of others. For more information, see Civic Worldwide.